Anatomy of an Unfunny Blog Entry
Dear Stupidocles,
How do you manage to consistently write blog entries that are so incredibly not funny?
Sincerely,
Oliver Reeders
Well sir or madam (as the case may be), let me step out of my Stupidocles persona for a moment to answer your question. There are so many unfunny entries to choose from, but let's analyze "Of all the nerve!", my review of Al Gore's "The Assault on Reason":
First I begin by establishing the stupidity of my assumed persona: "I don't normally do book reviews, especially of books I've never read nor intend to read". Who else but an idiot would not normally do book reviews, especially of books they've never read nor intend to read?
Then I expand on this stupidity by raging against something for a preposterous or inscrutable reason: "...but this one has me furious! That title represents the height of arrogance...Mr. Gore has the gall to insist..." Why, you may ask, would "The Assault on Reason" represent the height of arrogance and deserve to be condemned without being read? Ah, you say, because Stupidocles is a partisan hack with a political agenda against Mr. Gore. Time to tune out his rant--this nut has nothing to say.
Finally I provide the real reason for my persona's discontent: "...I would never be so presumptuous as to assert that my book was The definitive example of anything." Stupidocles has misread the italicized The in the title and taken it entirely the wrong way: When someone says "That eel restaurant is the place to go" or "Candy Land is the game of the century" they mean that it is the best, most perfect of its kind. So one can understand why Stupidocles, thinking along these lines, would be offended by Mr. Gore's book title touting itself as the best, most perfect Assault on Reason. Especially when Stupidocles himself takes pride in the business of assaulting reason and considers himself to be quite good at it.
Recent Comments